tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1647656873881736118.post4079406952652631112..comments2023-05-21T04:15:56.050-05:00Comments on Flatland Apologetics: Bart's blunderShelby Cadehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03283839806468851849noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1647656873881736118.post-61048145330422625072010-12-29T11:03:05.015-06:002010-12-29T11:03:05.015-06:00I'm in the process of watching this debate now...I'm in the process of watching this debate now. I'm about 70% through it, and frankly, I've grown tired of Erhman's repetitive arguments. He seems to only repeat again and again that the historian is not allowed to use supernatural explanations (where does he get this rule?) and that miracles by definition are so improbable that they cannot be the most probable answer.Andy Wrasmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09404901729530244690noreply@blogger.com